+1 regards, gerhard
2015-01-06 20:19 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > +1. Having the returned value is indeed an overkill for PropertySources. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 6 January 2015, 19:56, Anatole Tresch <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > BTW from my exoerience in implementing and specially combining the > > PropertySources within the ConfigurationContext, I would say SPI handling > > would be easier, if we would not return optional for the sources. On > > Configuration I like the idea much more, but on SPI side, I think > Optional > > is an overkill. > > > > WDYT? > > > > Best, > > Anatole > > > > -- > > *Anatole Tresch* > > Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead > > Glärnischweg 10 > > CH - 8620 Wetzikon > > > > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* > > *Twitter: @atsticks* > > *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ > > <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* > > > > *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79* > > >
