There is a 0.1 branch and I didn't want to clash with it. Also if you look at all the core concepts then you will see that there is a huge difference between what has been there initially (0.1) and what we do have now after all the very good discussions.
I personally don't care much about the version. But I'd say we should only go back to 0.1 if we all agree that the concepts we now have in 0.2 is the way to go and we do not need the 0.1 branch anymore. LieGrue, strub > On Wednesday, 7 January 2015, 7:29, Anatole Tresch <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 for 0.1 > John D. Ament <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi., 7. Jan. 2015 um > 02:42: > >> All, >> >> Seems like we are targetting a 0.2 release and forgetting about 0.1. >> >> It seems like things have settled down a bit, so why wouldn't we call > the >> first release 0.1 instead of 0.2? >> >> John >> >
