+1 for 0.1 Le 7 janv. 2015 08:02, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> There is a 0.1 branch and I didn't want to clash with it. > > Also if you look at all the core concepts then you will see that there is > a huge difference between what has been there initially (0.1) and what we > do have now after all the very good discussions. > > I personally don't care much about the version. But I'd say we should only > go back to 0.1 if we all agree that the concepts we now have in 0.2 is the > way to go and we do not need the 0.1 branch anymore. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > On Wednesday, 7 January 2015, 7:29, Anatole Tresch <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 for 0.1 > > John D. Ament <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi., 7. Jan. 2015 um > > 02:42: > > > >> All, > >> > >> Seems like we are targetting a 0.2 release and forgetting about 0.1. > >> > >> It seems like things have settled down a bit, so why wouldn't we call > > the > >> first release 0.1 instead of 0.2? > >> > >> John > >> > > >
