+1 meeeeh don't care. Just pick one and tell me or just upgrade the version ;)

LieGrue,
strub





> On Wednesday, 7 January 2015, 22:29, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > is it that important? both can be justified...
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
> 
> 
> 
> 2015-01-07 22:15 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <[email protected]>:
>>  I see the current state as a good start to continue, so I dont see anyneed
>>  to keep 0.1. If we would through out contextuality, this would change. That
>>  would be a showstopper for me...
>> 
>>  2015-01-07 20:48 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek 
> <[email protected]>:
>> 
>>>  @mark: +1
>>> 
>>>  regards,
>>>  gerhard
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  2015-01-07 8:00 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>>  > There is a 0.1 branch and I didn't want to clash with it.
>>>  >
>>>  > Also if you look at all the core concepts then you will see that 
> there is
>>>  > a huge difference between what has been there initially (0.1) and 
> what we
>>>  > do have now after all the very good discussions.
>>>  >
>>>  > I personally don't care much about the version. But I'd 
> say we should
>>>  only
>>>  > go back to 0.1 if we all agree that the concepts we now have in 
> 0.2 is
>>>  the
>>>  > way to go and we do not need the 0.1 branch anymore.
>>>  >
>>>  > LieGrue,
>>>  > strub
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  > > On Wednesday, 7 January 2015, 7:29, Anatole Tresch 
> <[email protected]
>>>  >
>>>  > wrote:
>>>  > > > +1 for 0.1
>>>  > > John D. Ament <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi., 
> 7. Jan. 2015 um
>>>  > > 02:42:
>>>  > >
>>>  > >>  All,
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >>  Seems like we are targetting a 0.2 release and 
> forgetting about 0.1.
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >>  It seems like things have settled down a bit, so why 
> wouldn't we call
>>>  > > the
>>>  > >>  first release 0.1 instead of 0.2?
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >>  John
>>>  > >>
>>>  > >
>>>  >
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  --
>>  *Anatole Tresch*
>>  Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead
>>  Glärnischweg 10
>>  CH - 8620 Wetzikon
>> 
>>  *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
>>  *Twitter:  @atsticks*
>>  *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
>>  <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>*
>> 
>>  *Google: atsticksMobile  +41-76 344 62 79*
>

Reply via email to