is it that important? both can be justified...
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-07 22:15 GMT+01:00 Anatole Tresch <[email protected]>: > I see the current state as a good start to continue, so I dont see anyneed > to keep 0.1. If we would through out contextuality, this would change. That > would be a showstopper for me... > > 2015-01-07 20:48 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: > >> @mark: +1 >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> >> >> 2015-01-07 8:00 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >> >> > There is a 0.1 branch and I didn't want to clash with it. >> > >> > Also if you look at all the core concepts then you will see that there is >> > a huge difference between what has been there initially (0.1) and what we >> > do have now after all the very good discussions. >> > >> > I personally don't care much about the version. But I'd say we should >> only >> > go back to 0.1 if we all agree that the concepts we now have in 0.2 is >> the >> > way to go and we do not need the 0.1 branch anymore. >> > >> > LieGrue, >> > strub >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > On Wednesday, 7 January 2015, 7:29, Anatole Tresch <[email protected] >> > >> > wrote: >> > > > +1 for 0.1 >> > > John D. Ament <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi., 7. Jan. 2015 um >> > > 02:42: >> > > >> > >> All, >> > >> >> > >> Seems like we are targetting a 0.2 release and forgetting about 0.1. >> > >> >> > >> It seems like things have settled down a bit, so why wouldn't we call >> > > the >> > >> first release 0.1 instead of 0.2? >> > >> >> > >> John >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > > -- > *Anatole Tresch* > Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead > Glärnischweg 10 > CH - 8620 Wetzikon > > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1* > *Twitter: @atsticks* > *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/ > <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>* > > *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79*
