+1 for a sandbox were all not originally targetted features are added. Side note: we can also release some sandbox module as experimental to test popularity and then graduate them. Main goal is to ensure we only add what is needed to the main release.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2015-03-24 10:03 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <[email protected]>: > I don't think any large discussion here makes sense either, nor a vote. > We already have plenty "TBD" items on the Modules page, IMHO anything that > is not part of the JDK (like java.time would be based on Java 8) does not > belong to core at all, but could be offered as "Integration" just like > Spring is proposed here: > http://tamaya.incubator.apache.org/modules.html#integrations > > What I think is a good idea (and we shall discuss it or vote on it here;-) > would be "Sandbox" like Apache Commons: > http://commons.apache.org/sandbox.html > That's where any "I really like this nifty cool Framework" ideas should > start, then they may make their way into offical modules;-) > > Anatole knows, this works rather well for JSR 354 where we called this > sandbox "Shelter" and many new ideas like Bitcoin or Groovy support got a > lot of attention by the community lately. > > WDYT? > > Werner > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA) < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > [ > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAMAYA-72?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14377448#comment-14377448 > > ] > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau commented on TAMAYA-72: > > ------------------------------------------ > > > > @Olivier: once again jira is not the place for it. In 2 words just check > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya.git;a=tree;f=modules;h=5522335b17496e5de48e3dda0d150376bdcb0986;hb=0375eb7cd87191c5d8a5598354860f15cc7df694 > . > > This means tamaya core (the main value of tamaya) is already skipped > > depending users so we are loosing tamaya evolution control before getting > > any feedback which is really wrong for the product lifecycle. This has > > nothing linked to joda but to modules. If we release and we have a lot of > > mails on the list saying "i want joda" then +1 but adding feature before > > *users* feedback just lead to noise. > > > > > PropertyConverters for JodaTime > > > ------------------------------- > > > > > > Key: TAMAYA-72 > > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAMAYA-72 > > > Project: Tamaya > > > Issue Type: New Feature > > > Affects Versions: 0.1-incubating > > > Reporter: Oliver B. Fischer > > > Assignee: Oliver B. Fischer > > > Priority: Minor > > > Labels: format > > > Fix For: 0.1-incubating > > > > > > > > > JodaTime is a widely used library. We should offer an extension with > > converters for JodaTime. > > > > > > > > -- > > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > > (v6.3.4#6332) > > >
