What for, "modules" vs. "integration" e.g. for things like consule, etcd, etc. or how would they be told apart? If "modules" and "sandbox" already exist, I guess we can also find a logical structure for POMs in one repo, so I'm open here.
Werner On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Oliver B. Fischer <[email protected] > wrote: > There is a little missunderstanding. We have already a sandbox via > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tamaya-sandbox.git > > My last question was if we would like to have two repositories for the > mature/non-sandbox modules or not. There was the suggestion to divide the > mature extension module in modules for data formats and data types and a > second one for modules who integration third party systems as consul with > Tamaya. > > WDYT? > > Am 09.09.16 um 17:23 schrieb Werner Keil: > > +1 for two repos. Makes more sense, than calling everything "sandbox". >> >> Werner >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:59 AM, P. Ottlinger <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Am 08.09.2016 um 21:09 schrieb Oliver B. Fischer: >>> >>>> What to you think about it? There are pros and cons for both? >>>> >>> +1 for two repos: >>> >>> * extensions-sandbox = experimental >>> * extensions = mature stuff >>> >>> I'd still prefer to have a multimodule project even for the experimental >>> extensions. >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf > >
