Or better in "each of these repos";-)
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > What for, "modules" vs. "integration" e.g. for things like consule, etcd, > etc. or how would they be told apart? > If "modules" and "sandbox" already exist, I guess we can also find a > logical structure for POMs in one repo, so I'm open here. > > Werner > > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Oliver B. Fischer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> There is a little missunderstanding. We have already a sandbox via >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tamaya-sandbox.git >> >> My last question was if we would like to have two repositories for the >> mature/non-sandbox modules or not. There was the suggestion to divide the >> mature extension module in modules for data formats and data types and a >> second one for modules who integration third party systems as consul with >> Tamaya. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Am 09.09.16 um 17:23 schrieb Werner Keil: >> >> +1 for two repos. Makes more sense, than calling everything "sandbox". >>> >>> Werner >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:59 AM, P. Ottlinger <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Am 08.09.2016 um 21:09 schrieb Oliver B. Fischer: >>>> >>>>> What to you think about it? There are pros and cons for both? >>>>> >>>> +1 for two repos: >>>> >>>> * extensions-sandbox = experimental >>>> * extensions = mature stuff >>>> >>>> I'd still prefer to have a multimodule project even for the experimental >>>> extensions. >>>> >>>> Phil >>>> >>>> >> -- >> N Oliver B. Fischer >> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany >> P +49 30 44793251 >> M +49 178 7903538 >> E [email protected] >> S oliver.b.fischer >> J [email protected] >> X http://xing.to/obf >> >> >
