If incubator-tamaya-sandbox was only meant for experiments on "core" modules currently in the main "tamaya" repo, that might make sense. Otherwise I suppose we could structure all "sandbox" efforts in a way under the "sandbox" repo.
Werner On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 8:04 PM, P. Ottlinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > to my mind the naming is a bit overkill. > > Am 10.09.2016 um 16:40 schrieb Oliver B. Fischer: > > So, if no one objects until Monday evening we will have to following > > three repos.(?) > > > > - tamaya-sandbox > > - tamaya-types-format-extensions > > - tamaya-integration-extensions > > > Current repos are: > * incubator-tamaya > * incubator-tamaya-sandbox > * incubator-tamaya-extensions > > > I'd suggest to add just one more generic one: > * incubator-tamaya-extensions-sandbox = experimental extension stuff > > since > * incubator-tamaya-extensions > contains mature stuff. > > Each of these generic modules is a collection of maven submodules ... > I'm still in favour of that since it eases Jenkins integration and does > not provide a matrix of jobs that nobody really understands properly. > > > Just my 2ct concerning the repo structure. > > Phil >
