Everything coming in from the outside will have to go through the incubator to assure that the licensing/IP issues are taken care of.
-----Original Message----- From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:20 AM To: Tapestry development Subject: Re: Tapestry Commons Subproject... I'd have to agree about javaforge. It is probably good for many purposes but rather restrictive for open source projects.. What kind of sub-projects did you have in mind, and how did you plan on addressing the potential LGPL/GPL licensing issues brought up before ? p.s. I'm generally "for this", just know we have to address the licensing issue first before entertaining any other thoughts. On 8/29/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know we discussed getting the "Tapestry Commons" subproject up and > running > some time ago. Can we go ahead and do that? The SVN server at JavaForge > is > really flaky. I keep getting complaints from folks that they can't > download > the source for some of the libraries out there. > > James > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo/(and a dash of TestNG), team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
