On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Joachim Van der Auwera (PROGS bvba) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I would release 5.0.15 as RC1. > Accumulate and fix bugs in 5.0.16 which would then be RC2 and can hopefully > be promoted to GA. If you know you're going to release an RC2, then RC1 never really was a candidate for release. RC2 should only result if problems are found with a released RC1, not as a way of deferring fixes for RC1. Also, just my humble opinion. I've just grown bitter with how RC rarely actually means release candidate these days. -- Kevin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
