Kevin Menard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Joachim Van der Auwera (PROGS bvba)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I would release 5.0.15 as RC1.
Accumulate and fix bugs in 5.0.16 which would then be RC2 and can hopefully
be promoted to GA.
If you know you're going to release an RC2, then RC1 never really was
a candidate for release. RC2 should only result if problems are found
with a released RC1, not as a way of deferring fixes for RC1. Also,
just my humble opinion. I've just grown bitter with how RC rarely
actually means release candidate these days.
Agreed, except that some issues only appear after 5.0.15 was cut.
Doing the release increases the number of people who will test it.
Joachim
--
Joachim Van der Auwera
PROGS bvba, progs.be
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
