On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:58:32 -0300, Massimo Lusetti <[email protected]> wrote:

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Bob Harner <[email protected]> wrote:

Sadly,  I suppose the compatibility issue will stay in peoples' minds
until, years from now, Tapestry 6 comes out and is fully compatible
with Tapestry 5.9. Or, hey, maybe 5.4 should be named 6.0 just for
that reason :-)   ... kidding, of course.

Maybe it could be a good idea... If the js abstraction layer will be
in for 5.4 it could justify the major version bump

Nice catch, Massimo! We need some good reason to call a version 6 instead of 5.x, otherwise our version numbering would become so meaningless as Firefox's now, and the JavaScript abstraction layer is a huge improvement.

--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to