On Sat, 09 May 2015 17:58:06 -0300, Lance Java <lance.j...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
I'm ok with using jquery directly, it would be interesting to know if
anyone is actually using 5.4 + prototype (I doubt it).
Project which were born in previous versions most probably still use
Prototype.js even after upgrading to T5.4.
Projects The good thing about jquery, compared to prototype, is that it
doesn't pollute existing
javascript objects (eg string). jquery is 35kb minified/gzipped, if
people want to use a different 'foundation' framework than jquery, I
doubt the
extra 35kb is a deal breaker to have both in use.
The extra kilobytes wouldn't be a deal breaker for me, but the lack of
backward compatibility and depending directly on any JS framework are,
IMHO.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
