On Tue, 12 May 2015 10:00:47 -0300, Ulrich Stärk <u...@spielviel.de> wrote:
I'm with Thiago on this one. The abstraction layer is a real benefit as demonstrated by Dimitri's request to ditch jQuery in favor of vanilla.js.
Any volunteers to implement the Tapestry JS abstraction layer on pure, framework-less JavaScript (aka vanilla.js)? I'd love to see that. :) I don't think we can jump to a vanilla solution directly, without an abstraction layer, because of, what else?, IE and also that pesky differences between browser implementations.
-- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer http://machina.com.br --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
