On Fri, 08 May 2015 17:36:07 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com>
wrote:
so this is very late in the game but I was just wondering how much better
tapestries client-side support could be if it just simply standardized on
jQuery and gave up on the abstraction layer. Thoughts?
-1 from me. I like the abstraction layer very much. I think the project
has been burned twice by using a JS framework directly (Dojo in T4,
Prototype in T5), so, specially with native JavaScript functions covering
more and more of what we use jQuery and Prototype for (what Dmitri called
vanilla JS), I think using any framework directly out-of-the-box is a bad
idea. We already have the abstraction layer anyway, so why not keep it?
Another downside would be a huge gap in backward compatibility, another
problem Tapestry already suffered a lot in the past.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
