There was a discussion thread that was started two weeks before the
vote thread, see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tez-dev/201803.mbox/browser.
Granted there weren't many comments, but there was a discussion thread
with no voiced objections well in advance of the vote thread.

Jason


On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Eagles <jeag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thoughts/Inputs/Discussion from Pig/Hive/Flink/Scalding/Scope communities?
>
> I wish we had used a discussion thread to gather more input from
> Pig/Hive/Flink/Scalding/Scope community before starting this vote whose
> outcome affects them. Without discussion or votes from those communities
> I'm not sure the community support for this decision. Should we consider
> canceling this vote to gather input first?
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Kuhu Shukla <kshu...@oath.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1.
>>
>> Thank you Eric for floating the proposal.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kuhu
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Jason Lowe <jl...@oath.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Jason
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Eric Wohlstadter <wohls...@cs.ubc.ca>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Please vote (binding or unbinding) on the following proposal. The vote
>> > will
>> > > be open until 3pm (Pacific) April 13th.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Proposal: Move master to support minimum Hadoop 3+ (0.10.x line) and
>> > create
>> > > separate branch for Hadoop 2 (0.9.x line)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Details:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >    - Tez master branch would support only Hadoop 3+ moving forward
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >    - As a general policy, Maven dependencies on master are required not
>> > to
>> > >    have conflicts with the dependencies of the corresponding minimum
>> > >    supported Hadoop (the dependency versions can vary between Tez
>> master
>> > and
>> > >    Hadoop if the versions are advertised as compatible by the
>> dependency
>> > >    provider).
>> > >
>> > >    - As a general policy, dependency conflicts between Tez and Hadoop
>> > >    should be resolved by using compatible jars. Shims/Shading could be
>> > used on
>> > >    a case-by-case basis, but not as a general policy.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >    - A separate branch and distribution (e.g. on Maven Central) will be
>> > >    created to maintain the 0.9.x line with minumum support for Hadoop
>> > 2.7.x
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >    - Bug fixes would be required to be pushed to both to master and the
>> > >    0.9.x line (unless they are specific to one of them)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >    - Major feature or performance improvements would be required to be
>> > >    pushed to both master and the 0.9.x line (unless they require Hadoop
>> > 3+ or
>> > >    have dependent library conflicts with Hadoop 2.x, in which case they
>> > may be
>> > >    pushed only to master)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >    - Minor feature or performance improvements can be pushed only to
>> > master
>> >
>>

Reply via email to