+1

Thank you,
Gunther.

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Eric Wohlstadter <wohls...@cs.ubc.ca>
wrote:

> Just a friendly reminder that this vote is still open.
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Jason Lowe <jl...@oath.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > There was a discussion thread that was started two weeks before the
> > vote thread, see
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tez-dev/201803.mbox/browser.
> > Granted there weren't many comments, but there was a discussion thread
> > with no voiced objections well in advance of the vote thread.
> >
> > Jason
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Eagles <jeag...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Thoughts/Inputs/Discussion from Pig/Hive/Flink/Scalding/Scope
> > communities?
> > >
> > > I wish we had used a discussion thread to gather more input from
> > > Pig/Hive/Flink/Scalding/Scope community before starting this vote whose
> > > outcome affects them. Without discussion or votes from those
> communities
> > > I'm not sure the community support for this decision. Should we
> consider
> > > canceling this vote to gather input first?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Kuhu Shukla <kshu...@oath.com.invalid
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you Eric for floating the proposal.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Kuhu
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Jason Lowe <jl...@oath.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +1
> > >> >
> > >> > Jason
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Eric Wohlstadter <
> wohls...@cs.ubc.ca>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > Please vote (binding or unbinding) on the following proposal. The
> > vote
> > >> > will
> > >> > > be open until 3pm (Pacific) April 13th.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Proposal: Move master to support minimum Hadoop 3+ (0.10.x line)
> and
> > >> > create
> > >> > > separate branch for Hadoop 2 (0.9.x line)
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Details:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >    - Tez master branch would support only Hadoop 3+ moving forward
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >    - As a general policy, Maven dependencies on master are
> required
> > not
> > >> > to
> > >> > >    have conflicts with the dependencies of the corresponding
> minimum
> > >> > >    supported Hadoop (the dependency versions can vary between Tez
> > >> master
> > >> > and
> > >> > >    Hadoop if the versions are advertised as compatible by the
> > >> dependency
> > >> > >    provider).
> > >> > >
> > >> > >    - As a general policy, dependency conflicts between Tez and
> > Hadoop
> > >> > >    should be resolved by using compatible jars. Shims/Shading
> could
> > be
> > >> > used on
> > >> > >    a case-by-case basis, but not as a general policy.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >    - A separate branch and distribution (e.g. on Maven Central)
> > will be
> > >> > >    created to maintain the 0.9.x line with minumum support for
> > Hadoop
> > >> > 2.7.x
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >    - Bug fixes would be required to be pushed to both to master
> and
> > the
> > >> > >    0.9.x line (unless they are specific to one of them)
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >    - Major feature or performance improvements would be required
> to
> > be
> > >> > >    pushed to both master and the 0.9.x line (unless they require
> > Hadoop
> > >> > 3+ or
> > >> > >    have dependent library conflicts with Hadoop 2.x, in which case
> > they
> > >> > may be
> > >> > >    pushed only to master)
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >    - Minor feature or performance improvements can be pushed only
> to
> > >> > master
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to