+1 Thank you, Gunther.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Eric Wohlstadter <[email protected]> wrote: > Just a friendly reminder that this vote is still open. > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Jason Lowe <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > There was a discussion thread that was started two weeks before the > > vote thread, see > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tez-dev/201803.mbox/browser. > > Granted there weren't many comments, but there was a discussion thread > > with no voiced objections well in advance of the vote thread. > > > > Jason > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Eagles <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Thoughts/Inputs/Discussion from Pig/Hive/Flink/Scalding/Scope > > communities? > > > > > > I wish we had used a discussion thread to gather more input from > > > Pig/Hive/Flink/Scalding/Scope community before starting this vote whose > > > outcome affects them. Without discussion or votes from those > communities > > > I'm not sure the community support for this decision. Should we > consider > > > canceling this vote to gather input first? > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Kuhu Shukla <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1. > > >> > > >> Thank you Eric for floating the proposal. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Kuhu > > >> > > >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Jason Lowe <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 > > >> > > > >> > Jason > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Eric Wohlstadter < > [email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > Please vote (binding or unbinding) on the following proposal. The > > vote > > >> > will > > >> > > be open until 3pm (Pacific) April 13th. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Proposal: Move master to support minimum Hadoop 3+ (0.10.x line) > and > > >> > create > > >> > > separate branch for Hadoop 2 (0.9.x line) > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Details: > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > - Tez master branch would support only Hadoop 3+ moving forward > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > - As a general policy, Maven dependencies on master are > required > > not > > >> > to > > >> > > have conflicts with the dependencies of the corresponding > minimum > > >> > > supported Hadoop (the dependency versions can vary between Tez > > >> master > > >> > and > > >> > > Hadoop if the versions are advertised as compatible by the > > >> dependency > > >> > > provider). > > >> > > > > >> > > - As a general policy, dependency conflicts between Tez and > > Hadoop > > >> > > should be resolved by using compatible jars. Shims/Shading > could > > be > > >> > used on > > >> > > a case-by-case basis, but not as a general policy. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > - A separate branch and distribution (e.g. on Maven Central) > > will be > > >> > > created to maintain the 0.9.x line with minumum support for > > Hadoop > > >> > 2.7.x > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > - Bug fixes would be required to be pushed to both to master > and > > the > > >> > > 0.9.x line (unless they are specific to one of them) > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > - Major feature or performance improvements would be required > to > > be > > >> > > pushed to both master and the 0.9.x line (unless they require > > Hadoop > > >> > 3+ or > > >> > > have dependent library conflicts with Hadoop 2.x, in which case > > they > > >> > may be > > >> > > pushed only to master) > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > - Minor feature or performance improvements can be pushed only > to > > >> > master > > >> > > > >> > > >
