On 2/9/07, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/9/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - DefinitionManager in core (org.apache.tiles.impl.mgmt) is missing a > source file header > - The notice file copyright statement is to 2006 (not 2007)[X] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Given the above 2 issues I have to agree with Niall. Thanks for such a thorough review :-). I think the other issues you listed would not prohibit an alpha. I guess the difference between a test build and an alpha is just that a test build is not an actual release?
For our purpose, yes. So far as i know, the only real requirements for a release are that we have our license ducks in a row and get three +1s for releasing from the PMC. I don't think there are any requirements on what label (test/alpha/beta/GA/M1/whatever) we give the build, however, for the purposes of establishing our release process, i do not think we should be releasing what we consider to be no better than test builds.
Thanks, Greg
