Nathan Bubna wrote:
For our purpose, yes. So far as i know, the only real requirements for a release are that we have our license ducks in a row and get three +1s for releasing from the PMC. I don't think there are any requirements on what label (test/alpha/beta/GA/M1/whatever) we give the build, however, for the purposes of establishing our release process, i do not think we should be releasing what we consider to be no better than test builds.
Really? Than what would you suggest an alpha is? To me, alpha is precisely that - a test build that has been pushed out to the public in order to get additional feedback that will help in refining things into a beta. If I'm off base, perhaps we're not ready for an initial release? David
Thanks, Greg
