+1 I find this to be way more explicit. Kinda got tripped by this a while
back.

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <m...@gremlin.guru> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was thinking that store() and aggregate() should simply be “store().”
> >
> >         store()         -> store(local)
> >         aggregate()     -> store(global)
> >
> > Or:
> >
> >         aggregate() ->  barrier().store()
> >
> > Random thoughts…
> >
> > Marko.
> >
> > http://markorodriguez.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to