yeah I like the barrier().store() best as well. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think barrier().store() for .aggregate() is very appropriate and fully > tells what is going on. > > I like both, +1 for one or the other. > > People also tend to confuse .as() and .store()/.aggregate(). > > On Tuesday, 20 September 2016, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I was thinking that store() and aggregate() should simply be “store().” > > > > store() -> store(local) > > aggregate() -> store(global) > > > > Or: > > > > aggregate() -> barrier().store() > > > > Random thoughts… > > > > Marko. > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste >
