On Aug 9, 2017 8:23 AM, "Ted Wilmes" <twil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That makes good sense to me. I'd be honored to lead it off into the sunset. > > --Ted > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra <jorgebaygon...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > 3.1 line is about 2 years old, I think its a lot of time for a relatively > > new project like TinkerPop. > > I'm in favor of making 3.1.8 the last release of the 3.1 branch. > > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > We have taken backward compatibility and long term support to a new > level > > > in TinkerPop 3.x as compared with previous major versions. We're about > to > > > go on eight releases of the 3.1.x line of code. Now that 3.3.0 is about > > to > > > release I'm wondering if we need to continue with support of any kind > on > > > the 3.1.x line (similar to how we stopped completely stopped dev on > > 3.0.x). > > > > > > I can expand this discussion to the user mailing list, but I thought > I'd > > > start here to see what people thought. Can we make 3.1.8 our last > release > > > on that line of code? > > > > > >
