Expanded this discussion to the user list: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gremlin-users/zQHHOC5uoYw/tSaxOlMFCgAJ
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on closing out with 3.1.8 > > Most providers have already moved to 3.2.x. Any providers still on 3.1.x > should chime in on this thread (BlazeGraph > <https://github.com/blazegraph/tinkerpop3/blob/master/pom.xml#L69>, > ChronoGraph > <https://github.com/MartinHaeusler/chronos/blob/ > master/build.gradle#L75-L76>) > if they need it to keep going. > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:19 AM, David Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Aug 9, 2017 8:23 AM, "Ted Wilmes" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > That makes good sense to me. I'd be honored to lead it off into the > > sunset. > > > > > > --Ted > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > 3.1 line is about 2 years old, I think its a lot of time for a > > relatively > > > > new project like TinkerPop. > > > > I'm in favor of making 3.1.8 the last release of the 3.1 branch. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > We have taken backward compatibility and long term support to a new > > > level > > > > > in TinkerPop 3.x as compared with previous major versions. We're > > about > > > to > > > > > go on eight releases of the 3.1.x line of code. Now that 3.3.0 is > > about > > > > to > > > > > release I'm wondering if we need to continue with support of any > kind > > > on > > > > > the 3.1.x line (similar to how we stopped completely stopped dev on > > > > 3.0.x). > > > > > > > > > > I can expand this discussion to the user mailing list, but I > thought > > > I'd > > > > > start here to see what people thought. Can we make 3.1.8 our last > > > release > > > > > on that line of code? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
