It's been a week now and there haven't been any concerns about EOL for 3.1.x on either this list or more recently the gremlin users list. I'm happy to call that consensus. :) we'll make 3.1.8 the last release on that line.
We'll just have tp32 and master to maintain going forward - i don't think we need to branch a tp33 at this point as I don't think anyone is considering 3.4.x at this point. On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > Expanded this discussion to the user list: https://groups.google. > com/d/msg/gremlin-users/zQHHOC5uoYw/tSaxOlMFCgAJ > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 on closing out with 3.1.8 >> >> Most providers have already moved to 3.2.x. Any providers still on 3.1.x >> should chime in on this thread (BlazeGraph >> <https://github.com/blazegraph/tinkerpop3/blob/master/pom.xml#L69>, >> ChronoGraph >> <https://github.com/MartinHaeusler/chronos/blob/master/ >> build.gradle#L75-L76>) >> if they need it to keep going. >> >> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:19 AM, David Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Aug 9, 2017 8:23 AM, "Ted Wilmes" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > That makes good sense to me. I'd be honored to lead it off into the >> > sunset. >> > > >> > > --Ted >> > > >> > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra < >> > [email protected] >> > > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > 3.1 line is about 2 years old, I think its a lot of time for a >> > relatively >> > > > new project like TinkerPop. >> > > > I'm in favor of making 3.1.8 the last release of the 3.1 branch. >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Stephen Mallette < >> > [email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > We have taken backward compatibility and long term support to a >> new >> > > level >> > > > > in TinkerPop 3.x as compared with previous major versions. We're >> > about >> > > to >> > > > > go on eight releases of the 3.1.x line of code. Now that 3.3.0 is >> > about >> > > > to >> > > > > release I'm wondering if we need to continue with support of any >> kind >> > > on >> > > > > the 3.1.x line (similar to how we stopped completely stopped dev >> on >> > > > 3.0.x). >> > > > > >> > > > > I can expand this discussion to the user mailing list, but I >> thought >> > > I'd >> > > > > start here to see what people thought. Can we make 3.1.8 our last >> > > release >> > > > > on that line of code? >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
