-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Mark,

On 5/9/19 12:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/05/2019 17:44, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Rémy and Mark,
>> 
>> On 5/9/19 12:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 4:47 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> 
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>>> On 09/05/2019 14:38, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> <snip/>
>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 to hard-coding to a single acceptor thread and
>>>>>> removing the plumbing that supports more than that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ok, done.
>>>> 
>>>> Great.
>>>> 
>>>>> So I suppose you prefer keeping the ability to have
>>>>> multiple poller
>>>> threads
>>>>> for NIO ?
>>>> 
>>>> NIO defaults to 1 anyway.
>>>> 
>>>> I agree with that multiple Poller threads is unlikely to
>>>> offer a performance benefit in any realistic scenario.
>>>> 
>>>> APR only supported multiple Poller threads because of a
>>>> Windows XP / Server 2003 issue that limited poller size to
>>>> 1024. Other than that, comments in the APR code indicate a
>>>> preference for a single Poller.
>>>> 
>> 
>>> Yes, I ran into that then ...
>> 
>> I'm not sure it's okay to drop support for Server 2003 at this
>> point, is it?
> 
> Extended support for Server 2003 ended on July 14, 2015. That puts
> it into the category - in my view - of 'we'll support it while we
> can but if there are benefits to us of dropping support we will do
> so'
> 
>> Or, I guess we are okay if we drop APR support on Server 2003 ; 
>> NIO will still work just fine, right?
> 
> Correct. Users on server 2003 could still use NIO.

Ack. +1 for removal of multiple poller threads.

- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/
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=6Nuj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to