On 09/05/2019 17:44, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Rémy and Mark, > > On 5/9/19 12:32, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 4:47 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> >> wrote: > >>> On 09/05/2019 14:38, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >>> >>> <snip/> >>> >>>>> +1 to hard-coding to a single acceptor thread and removing >>>>> the plumbing that supports more than that. >>>> >>>> Ok, done. >>> >>> Great. >>> >>>> So I suppose you prefer keeping the ability to have multiple >>>> poller >>> threads >>>> for NIO ? >>> >>> NIO defaults to 1 anyway. >>> >>> I agree with that multiple Poller threads is unlikely to offer a >>> performance benefit in any realistic scenario. >>> >>> APR only supported multiple Poller threads because of a Windows >>> XP / Server 2003 issue that limited poller size to 1024. Other >>> than that, comments in the APR code indicate a preference for a >>> single Poller. >>> > >> Yes, I ran into that then ... > > I'm not sure it's okay to drop support for Server 2003 at this point, > is it?
Extended support for Server 2003 ended on July 14, 2015. That puts it into the category - in my view - of 'we'll support it while we can but if there are benefits to us of dropping support we will do so' > Or, I guess we are okay if we drop APR support on Server 2003 ; > NIO will still work just fine, right? Correct. Users on server 2003 could still use NIO. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
