+1... It works like a charm! []s, Thiago.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 ;-) > > Jeff > > On Nov 11, 2013, at 6:47 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting. > > > > I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 > binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're > good to go. > > > > Maven Repo: > > > > - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/ > > > > Binaries: > > > > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/ > > > > Tag: > > > > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ > > > > > > The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a > positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can collect > all possible feedback and surface *all* issues. > > > > If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new > binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first set > of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a negative. > Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their choosing > to make up for their lost time. :) > > > > > > -David > > > >
