+1
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > +1 > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2013/11/12 Thiago Veronezi <thi...@veronezi.org>: > > +1... It works like a charm! > > > > []s, > > Thiago. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> +1 ;-) > >> > >> Jeff > >> > >> On Nov 11, 2013, at 6:47 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting. > >> > > >> > I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 > >> binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like > we're > >> good to go. > >> > > >> > Maven Repo: > >> > > >> > - > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/ > >> > > >> > Binaries: > >> > > >> > - > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/ > >> > > >> > Tag: > >> > > >> > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/ > >> > > >> > > >> > The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a > >> positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can > collect > >> all possible feedback and surface *all* issues. > >> > > >> > If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push > new > >> binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first > set > >> of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a > negative. > >> Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their > choosing > >> to make up for their lost time. :) > >> > > >> > > >> > -David > >> > > >> > >> >
