Some JAX-RS tests are using JPA 2.1 features which is not supported yet.
From: John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
To: dev@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: 7.0.0 release vote
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:44 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Not portable test, jpa on not jpa tests etc. We pass really more tests
> AFAIK.
Could you elaborate on that a little? What is not portable? If you want to
raise issues in our ticket system please feel free:
https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/issues
Or if you want to just say them, I can put them into github.
> Le 2 mai 2016 05:48, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > No worries on the many posts. Thank you for the Java EE 7 samples
> checkup
> > :)
> >
> > It appears we fail 35% of the JAX-RS 2.0 tests. Do we know what is
> > preventing us from passing those tests?
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Blevins
> > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> > > On May 1, 2016, at 6:42 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry for so many posts :-)
> > >
> > > TomEE Plus 7.0.0-M3 passes 238/338 tests in the suite.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I ended up changing the version and updating the code. I ran the
> tests,
> > >> you can see the output in this gist:
> > >> https://gist.github.com/johnament/2443e79836605a913159b14295681536
> > >>
> > >> TomEE Plus fails at about 100 tests.
> > >>
> > >> John
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:10 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> If it helps any, I can push up the latest TomEE version to the TomEE
> > >>> profile:
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/blob/master/pom.xml#L690
> > >>>
> > >>> John
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:07 PM David Blevins <
> david.blev...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> In terms of statements of compliance, which of these Java EE 7
> samples
> > >>>> will currently run successfully?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> - https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples <
> > >>>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> David Blevins
> > >>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Apr 28, 2016, at 6:19 AM, ross.cohen <ross.cohen...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Actually, it looks like a 7.0 release means different things to
> > >>>> different
> > >>>>> people. Romain, you took everyone's approval of the idea of a
> 7.0.0
> > >>>> release
> > >>>>> to be an approval of your particular version of a 7.0.0 release,
> > which
> > >>>> it
> > >>>>> clearly was not. Looks to me like a finer-grained vote is needed
> to
> > >>>> figure
> > >>>>> out exactly what people want as part of 7.0.0 release.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Personally, I think David is correct in saying that a release
> without
> > >>>> some
> > >>>>> kind of positive JEE 7 compatibility statement is a serious
> mistake.
> > >>>> I know
> > >>>>> the TCK is out of the question right now, but that simply means you
> > >>>> need to
> > >>>>> invent an alternative compatibility statement: "Apache-Certified
> > >>>> Compliant
> > >>>>> to Web Profile Specifications" (or some such).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> View this message in context:
> > >>>>
> >
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/7-0-0-release-vote-tp4678284.html
> > >>>>> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> >
>
