I still feel we are due another Milestone release until TomEE is a little closer to the mark. There needs to be a really strong statement as to what is available and what is not. There has already been some negative feedback from power users that expected more, and were disappointed to find missing features they expected to find merely based on the 7.x label - Wrongly thinking that TomEE EE7 support was complete (Because we haven't really told them).
Would there be a problem distributing the latest Hibernate (ASL) with TomEE? - Even if some features would need unwrapping and documenting. Andy. On 2 May 2016 at 13:48, Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > Some JAX-RS tests are using JPA 2.1 features which is not supported yet. > From: John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > To: dev@tomee.apache.org > Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 12:11 PM > Subject: Re: 7.0.0 release vote > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:44 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Not portable test, jpa on not jpa tests etc. We pass really more tests > > AFAIK. > > > Could you elaborate on that a little? What is not portable? If you want to > raise issues in our ticket system please feel free: > https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/issues > > Or if you want to just say them, I can put them into github. > > > > > Le 2 mai 2016 05:48, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > No worries on the many posts. Thank you for the Java EE 7 samples > > checkup > > > :) > > > > > > It appears we fail 35% of the JAX-RS 2.0 tests. Do we know what is > > > preventing us from passing those tests? > > > > > > > > > -- > > > David Blevins > > > http://twitter.com/dblevins > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > On May 1, 2016, at 6:42 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry for so many posts :-) > > > > > > > > TomEE Plus 7.0.0-M3 passes 238/338 tests in the suite. > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I ended up changing the version and updating the code. I ran the > > tests, > > > >> you can see the output in this gist: > > > >> https://gist.github.com/johnament/2443e79836605a913159b14295681536 > > > >> > > > >> TomEE Plus fails at about 100 tests. > > > >> > > > >> John > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:10 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> If it helps any, I can push up the latest TomEE version to the > TomEE > > > >>> profile: > > > >>> > > > > > > https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/blob/master/pom.xml#L690 > > > >>> > > > >>> John > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:07 PM David Blevins < > > david.blev...@gmail.com> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> In terms of statements of compliance, which of these Java EE 7 > > samples > > > >>>> will currently run successfully? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> - https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples < > > > >>>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> David Blevins > > > >>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > > > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> On Apr 28, 2016, at 6:19 AM, ross.cohen <ross.cohen...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Actually, it looks like a 7.0 release means different things to > > > >>>> different > > > >>>>> people. Romain, you took everyone's approval of the idea of a > > 7.0.0 > > > >>>> release > > > >>>>> to be an approval of your particular version of a 7.0.0 release, > > > which > > > >>>> it > > > >>>>> clearly was not. Looks to me like a finer-grained vote is needed > > to > > > >>>> figure > > > >>>>> out exactly what people want as part of 7.0.0 release. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Personally, I think David is correct in saying that a release > > without > > > >>>> some > > > >>>>> kind of positive JEE 7 compatibility statement is a serious > > mistake. > > > >>>> I know > > > >>>>> the TCK is out of the question right now, but that simply means > you > > > >>>> need to > > > >>>>> invent an alternative compatibility statement: "Apache-Certified > > > >>>> Compliant > > > >>>>> to Web Profile Specifications" (or some such). > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> View this message in context: > > > >>>> > > > > > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/7-0-0-release-vote-tp4678284.html > > > >>>>> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > -- Andy Gumbrecht https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe http://www.tomitribe.com
