I'm not sure if you're interpretting it as hibernate ORM is AL or not, but ORM is LGPL. OGM and search are also LGPL. Bean validation is pretty much the only ALv2 component.
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:31 AM Andy Gumbrecht <agumbre...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Yep, misleading use of the word 'OR' on this page - > http://hibernate.org/community/license/ - "Hibernate projects are licensed > under either the LGPL 2.1 or the ASL 2.0" > > On 2 May 2016 at 14:05, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2016-05-02 14:00 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <agumbre...@tomitribe.com>: > > > > > I still feel we are due another Milestone release until TomEE is a > little > > > closer to the mark. There needs to be a really strong statement as to > > what > > > is available and what is not. There has already been some negative > > feedback > > > from power users that expected more, and were disappointed to find > > missing > > > features they expected to find merely based on the 7.x label - Wrongly > > > thinking that TomEE EE7 support was complete (Because we haven't really > > > told them). > > > > > > > > Fully agree that's why it has been stated tomee 7 != javaee 7. We also > got > > very negative feedback and worse than negative feedbacks -> blockers to > not > > have a version without "M". You are free to do a milestone if you want > and > > even a 8.0.0 when we get certified. In the meantime I see only harmful > > reasons to block all people waiting on a not milestone (including > vendors). > > > > Said otherwise: I try to push the concrete path vs the philosophical one. > > > > > > > Would there be a problem distributing the latest Hibernate (ASL) with > > > TomEE? - Even if some features would need unwrapping and documenting. > > > > > > > > it is still mentionned being lgpl 2.1 on their website. validator is asl > > AFAIK cause of JCP but orm is not. Did you find another source? > > > > > > > Andy. > > > > > > On 2 May 2016 at 13:48, Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Some JAX-RS tests are using JPA 2.1 features which is not supported > > yet. > > > > From: John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > > > To: dev@tomee.apache.org > > > > Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 12:11 PM > > > > Subject: Re: 7.0.0 release vote > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:44 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Not portable test, jpa on not jpa tests etc. We pass really more > > tests > > > > > AFAIK. > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you elaborate on that a little? What is not portable? If you > > want > > > to > > > > raise issues in our ticket system please feel free: > > > > https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/issues > > > > > > > > Or if you want to just say them, I can put them into github. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 2 mai 2016 05:48, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > No worries on the many posts. Thank you for the Java EE 7 > samples > > > > > checkup > > > > > > :) > > > > > > > > > > > > It appears we fail 35% of the JAX-RS 2.0 tests. Do we know what > is > > > > > > preventing us from passing those tests? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > David Blevins > > > > > > http://twitter.com/dblevins > > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 1, 2016, at 6:42 PM, John D. Ament < > johndam...@apache.org > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for so many posts :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TomEE Plus 7.0.0-M3 passes 238/338 tests in the suite. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:30 PM John D. Ament < > > > johndam...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I ended up changing the version and updating the code. I ran > > the > > > > > tests, > > > > > > >> you can see the output in this gist: > > > > > > >> > > > https://gist.github.com/johnament/2443e79836605a913159b14295681536 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> TomEE Plus fails at about 100 tests. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> John > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:10 PM John D. Ament < > > > johndam...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> If it helps any, I can push up the latest TomEE version to > the > > > > TomEE > > > > > > >>> profile: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/blob/master/pom.xml#L690 > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> John > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 8:07 PM David Blevins < > > > > > david.blev...@gmail.com> > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>>> In terms of statements of compliance, which of these Java > EE 7 > > > > > samples > > > > > > >>>> will currently run successfully? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> - https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples < > > > > > > >>>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> -- > > > > > > >>>> David Blevins > > > > > > >>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > > > > > > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>>> On Apr 28, 2016, at 6:19 AM, ross.cohen < > > > ross.cohen...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> Actually, it looks like a 7.0 release means different > things > > to > > > > > > >>>> different > > > > > > >>>>> people. Romain, you took everyone's approval of the idea > of > > a > > > > > 7.0.0 > > > > > > >>>> release > > > > > > >>>>> to be an approval of your particular version of a 7.0.0 > > > release, > > > > > > which > > > > > > >>>> it > > > > > > >>>>> clearly was not. Looks to me like a finer-grained vote is > > > needed > > > > > to > > > > > > >>>> figure > > > > > > >>>>> out exactly what people want as part of 7.0.0 release. > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> Personally, I think David is correct in saying that a > release > > > > > without > > > > > > >>>> some > > > > > > >>>>> kind of positive JEE 7 compatibility statement is a serious > > > > > mistake. > > > > > > >>>> I know > > > > > > >>>>> the TCK is out of the question right now, but that simply > > means > > > > you > > > > > > >>>> need to > > > > > > >>>>> invent an alternative compatibility statement: > > > "Apache-Certified > > > > > > >>>> Compliant > > > > > > >>>>> to Web Profile Specifications" (or some such). > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > > > >>>>> View this message in context: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/7-0-0-release-vote-tp4678284.html > > > > > > >>>>> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Andy Gumbrecht > > > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > > > -- > Andy Gumbrecht > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe > http://www.tomitribe.com >
