Hi all, from a Customers or User perspective i totally agree with using version 2.x and wait with 7.x for the EE compliance. Thats pretty straight forward David. That would not confusing me.
Eduard Matej <gma...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di., 3. Mai 2016 um 07:08: > Hi all. Not developer. But I also think jumping to 7.x for no reason will > only confuse everyone. If ee7 will not be provided like 98 - 99 % > compliant. Then it would really be better to maybe just go 2.x route. I > think already now people that choose Tomee, dont really care about being > 100% compliant. But still would be nice to not confuse people. Br matej > 3. maj 2016 05.43 je oseba "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> > napisala: > > > > > > On May 2, 2016, at 5:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Fully agree that's why it has been stated tomee 7 != javaee 7. > > > > My memory of that vote was we intentionally aligned the TomEE version > > number specifically to align to the Java EE version number and further > that > > it would not be changed even if major change in the server occurred, > > stating “7.1” and “7.2” would be clear enough to communicate breaking > > upgrades. > > > > I voted -1 on that one, but the above was my understanding of what was > > decided. > > > > I’d be glad to hear it is not, but I would question why we didn’t just > > stick with 2.x if we weren’t intending to communicate “this implements > Java > > EE 7”. > > > > > > -David > > > > >
