Romain Manni-Bucau wrote > 2016-05-04 14:54 GMT+02:00 ross.cohen <
> ross.cohen.rc@ > >: > >> David Blevins-2 wrote >> >> On May 2, 2016, at 5:05 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> >> That is also my recollection of the question. >> >> But whether or not it was the case, it is certainly the case that any >> user >> downloading Tomee 7.x will do so under the impression that it is JEE 7 >> compliant. This is reason enough to either wait, or continue under the >> current numbering scheme. >> >> >> > Well both lead to the same: tomee is not adapted. Question is then: when > do > we stop waiting for something likely not coming? I don't really care about the TCK. Everyone would like it if Oracle would play nice and released a TCK for us, but it's not going to happen. However, compliance with the specs is a different matter. At what point are we compliant with the specs? Good question. David says the rest api passes only 75% of the published examples. To me, that is non-compliant. If it were 95%, I'd be willing to call us compliant. Exactly where is the line? I'm not sure, but it can't be much below 95%. If users find that the software frequently contradicts the spec, they will become frustrated and angry. Cheers -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/7-0-0-release-vote-tp4678284p4678361.html Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
