Hey everyone, i've been starting two PRs to include Jakarta MVC and TCK in TomEE
8.1.x => https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/991 9.x => https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/992 as David suggested this would have to be a minor update from 8.0.x to 8.1.x and for 9.x maybe too ? ( => 9.1.x ? ) the whole TCK thing is a totally new universe to me. i dont really know how and where to start. i'll take a closer look at the PDF in mvc tck *docs*. this pdf might not suffice. everyone is a little bit busy with the 9.x release and MP integration. + holidays nearing. any later help on setup the TCK for MVC will be welcomed. i hope maybe in can receive help and/or have more time for this in late January. Happy end of year celebrations to all. -- Swell On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 at 14:37, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2022, at 4:24 AM, Swell <souheil.sul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > David might jump in the boat to confirm, but, when updating the javadoc > at > > https://tomee.apache.org/jakartaee-10.0/javadoc/ and others, i tried to > add > > the MVC api to the javadoc and was told MVC is not part of the Full > > Specifications > > Right, MVC, NoSQL and Data are currently not part of any Jakarta EE > release (8,9,9.1 or 10). If we were to add it to TomEE, we could probably > put the javadoc up next to the jakartaee-* and microprofile-* javadoc so > it's clear we're not implying it's part of a Jakarta EE Platform release. > > > I'm unsure if we should add them together? (MVC api + Krazo) > > > > about Krazo having a Final Release, it has, we just have to be cautions > > with the compatibility: > > The primary thing we'd need in a PR to add Krazo is a working setup for > the MVC TCK. We maybe don't need the TCK passing for the PR to be merged > (mostly passing could work), but it would need to pass before TomEE 9 goes > final. Lately we've been putting the TCK setups here: > > - https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/main/tck > > We'd also want that in both Plus and Plume as they are supposed to be the > same in functionality and only differ by the implementations. > > > The idea of a starter web page or an IDE plugin is great, does someone > have > > knowledge in these fields? > > I shared what I know on starter. Jon once wrote an Eclipse Plugin. Not > sure if any of it would be helpful if you wanted to write something: > > - https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomee/openejb-eclipse-plugin/ > > Certainly a plugin that added features to the server could be pretty cool! > > Welcome to the land of "more ideas than time" :) You're in good company > :) If you find an escape route, let me know LOL :) > > > -David > > > On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 at 09:57, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > > wrote: > > > >> I'm fine adding Kazo. I was looking the other day to fix the examples, > and > >> I wanted to upgrade Krazo but the final release wasn't available yet. > Happy > >> to add it directly to TomEE so we don't need users to do it. Even more > now > >> that it's part of Jakarta EE Full Profile, we can add it to Plus and > Plume. > >> > >> Hibernate has been discussed already and we have added all the plumbing > to > >> make sure users can easily have it in their webapps or drop it in the > lib/ > >> directory and it will work out of the box. > >> > >> For DeltaSpike, it's not dead but there isn't much activity there and I > >> doubt it will be jakarta compatible anytime soon. I'm more concerned > about > >> adding this one. > >> If you need it just for some DAO (repository) pattern, it's easily > >> achievable without some big dependencies. TomEE has been able to do that > >> for quite a long time. We just don't do any promotion of the feature. > >> > >> For instance, there is an example available here > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/main/examples/dynamic-dao-implementation > >> Create an interface, add an annotation and TomEE will generate the > >> implementation for you. > >> The logic to parse method names, etc is available in this class > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/main/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/util/proxy/QueryProxy.java > >> > >> This is actually a specific use case of this feature and example > >> > https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/main/examples/dynamic-implementation > >> You can easily do design by contrat and implement your own handler to > >> generate the implementation under the cover. > >> > >> Hope it helps > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 11:48 PM David Blevins <dblev...@tomitribe.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>>> On Oct 5, 2022, at 4:29 PM, Memo Díaz Solis <diaz...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> In the spring boot world you just need to pick dependencies from the > >>>> initializer, so if we can provide something like that, it would be > >> easier > >>>> for new developers/students. > >>>> > >>>> Is there any reason to avoid something like that? I mean, it is > >>> something > >>>> like Microprofile starter but for TomEE, so that we can pick > deltaspike > >>>> modules as extra dependencies but defined at pom level. > >>> > >>> I would absolutely love if we could do something like that. > >> Specifically, > >>> as I've always wanted to ship Hibernate. I've even had talks with Red > >> Hat > >>> about potentially changing the license so that we could ship it -- they > >>> gave it an honest look too. > >>> > >>> The big issue with a "starter" site is Apache infrastructure only > allows > >>> static sites -- reasonably. If "we" wanted to do that it would have to > >> be > >>> externally hosted and not branded in a way that implies it is operated > by > >>> the Apache Software Foundation. > >>> > >>> > >>> -David > >>> > >>> > >> > >
