First you need to close the vote. Then the release needs to be approved in general, check the archives there for an example of the vote thread, as you need to add link to vote thread, cote result....
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil <chip.senkb...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things to > address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been open for > awhile. > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo <g...@bustelos.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > We need to get this thing moving. > > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits. > > > > > > Comments: > > > > > > KEYS file still missing. > > > Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip bundles. > > > For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it a bit tough to > validate > > > all dependencies. Not completed this fully though. Would be good if > other > > > folks who are reviewing can help. > > > For source release, there are a bunch of files without valid headers. > > Also > > > some files like .example-image, etc are part of the release tarball > when > > > they should not be. ( used `find . -type f | xargs grep -L "Licensed to > > the > > > Apache Software”` to find the ones in question). These should be fixed > > > before the next release. > > > The License/Notice file for the source bundle needs to be fixed. They > > > contain entries for items that are not part of the source bundle. > > > PKG-INFO for the pip package may need to be fixed. The license for it > is > > > not only ALv2 but a combination of all the other bits bundled into the > > > assembly jar. > > > > > > License/Notice files: > > > There are a bunch of copyright lines in the LICENSE file without any > > > indication of why they are there. At the moment, it seems to indicate > > they > > > are for all of the toree codebase. > > > > > > +0 for this release. > > > > > > I think that there has been enough work done on this initial release > that > > > it will be useful to get some more eyes from the larger Incubator group > > to > > > provide more useful feedback. > > > > > > Please note that this vote does need atleast 3 PPMC +1s to pass. > > > > > > thanks > > > — Hitesh > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Gino Bustelo <g...@bustelos.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as > > > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and > > > > NOTICE files since this is our first release. > > > > > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3 > > > > (5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d) > > > > > > > > * > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d > > > > < > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/commit/5bef39490daeda69d98a1e4cf4096103e80be44d > > > >* > > > > > > > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > > > found at: > > > > > > > > *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/ > > > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.1.0/rc3/>* > > > > > > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > > > least > > > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0 > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > > > > > > -- Sent from my Mobile device
