Hi Laurent, please review http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/CWS_Checklist_for_QA_responsibilities
Laurent Godard wrote: > HI > >> when I looked it up correctly, the cws python25 is still in state new. >> What the state currently ? >> > > the state should be ready for QA as the developper told he was done > btw, ther seems to be changes needed, see issue No, this is definitely not the case. See link above. > * All required install sets need to be existent (at least >one Windows and one Unix/Linux build, whereas both must be a product build). This requirement i not fulfilled from my point of view. As far as I understand the discussion, MAC OS X build fails. > * Issues submitted by developers must provide a test case > to ensure appropriate verification. There's no 'how-to test' provided. > * All issues must have the status 'Resolved/Fixed' Not the case. > * All issues must be assigned to a QA members (except those only developers > can verify) Not the case. > * Appropriate information about specific and global risks must be provided, > ... Not the case. > * For all features and changes a Change-Mail must be existent ... I don't know this. > > as i understand the situation, we lack a QA representative dealing with > the various plateform building and check Please spare both of us this polemic irony. Three times I raises the question of how to proceed with this CWS. Two times on this list and yesterday on IRC. Sorry, but this question never got really answered. All what happened, three times, was that I triggered a technical discussion about the broken MAC build. For example on March 1st some sub-threads of the discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list ended up with you making some 'need to clarify' statements. And now you're blaming me for the project getting stalled? Some information about the role of the QA representative: - QA Rep. is not in charge to build the source (This would be even against the idea of the CWS process) - QA Rep. organizes the QA effort of a CWS - QA Rep. doesn't organize the whole CWS process - QA Rep. is not necessarily in charge of doing all the testing For the last item, this is even not possible for me. Because I have no MAC available. I will ask Jogi from Sun in Hamburg to do this part. (BCCed him.) @Jogi: Hi Jogi, would you like to help us with this? Jogi is also OOo CWS gatekeeper and I bet he will agree with most of my statements. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Gatekeeper Best regards Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
