Hi Joerg, there's still one question open. Do you think building and testing the CWS on Windows, Linux and OSX is sufficient? Or would you prefer to also have a Solaris build of python25? If we need a Solaris build, could you provide it?
Best regards Peter Joerg Budischewski wrote: > Hi, > > @liyuan: I would try 3 ways to proceed with macos-x. > > * put a mail on the porting list to find a volunteer to work on the mac > port of this cws > * put a mail on the porting list, maybe there is someone who let you > access a mac machine with an ooo build env and do the port yourself. > * If you can't find anyone to do the port, I prefer not to let other > platforms suffer because of a single one, then you should rearrange the > makefiles in such a way, that macosx is built with python 2.3 while the > rest is built with 2.5. > > Bye, > > Joerg > > Peter Junge wrote: >> Hi Laurent, >> >> Laurent Godard wrote: >> >>> Hi Peter >>> >>> Thanks a lot for this detailed status >>> >>> >>>> This requirement i not fulfilled from my point of view. As far as I >>>> understand the discussion, MAC OS X build fails. >>>> >>> >>> Right >>> This Mac issue has blocked the process >>> as the discussion went on delivering python or not within OOo on MacOs >>> and was stalled for us (i do not read every mac irc discussion logs) >>> >>> things are evolving thanks to your IRC intervention >> >> >> That was my idea. I am still not sure if the MAC version still blocks >> the CWS. Do we have to wait for Joergs fix? >> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76281 >> >> >>>>> * Issues submitted by developers must provide a test case >>>>> to ensure appropriate verification. >>>> >>>> There's no 'how-to test' provided. >>>> >>> >>> mail merge tests could be used as written in python >> >> >> That's OK. >> >>> the developper knows what he modified and should be able to identify >>> functional parts that has to be covered >> >> >> @liyuan: I guess this is for you. Or am I wrong? >> >> >>>>> * All issues must have the status 'Resolved/Fixed' >>>> >>>> Not the case. >>>> >>> >>> yes >> >> >> Only one issue. Only of formal character. >> >> >>>>> * All issues must be assigned to a QA members (except those only >>>>> developers can verify) >>>> >>>> Not the case. >>>> >>> >>> who has to be assigned there in IZ ? I may call for volunteers >> >> >> I will be the right owner (when checklist requirements are met). Because >> testing effort has to split I think I will have to create some child >> issues for specific tasks. >> >> >>>>> as i understand the situation, we lack a QA representative dealing >>>>> with >>>>> the various plateform building and check >>>> >>>> Please spare both of us this polemic irony. >>> >>> I'm really sorry, it was not my intention !!! Please forgive me >> >> >> :-). No problem anymore. I have lots of understanding -especially for >> single contributers- that they are not always happy with the OOo >> progress all of the time. Same with me. >> I hope I was not too harsh too. Your mail was one of the first things >> that hit me in the morning after being late in the office due to Beijing >> traffic jam. >> >> >>> >>>> with you making some 'need to clarify' statements. And now you're >>>> blaming me for the project getting stalled? >>>> >>> >>> Reall sorry Peter, this was not my intention >>> I'm the first to blame not following this point :( >>> >>> For me the problem, after the macos one, was that no builder was >>> available for generating testing binaries on many plateform >>> Linux, Windows, Solaris and mac (being optional here, as not finished >>> yet). I thought proposing doing a fisrt step job for windows and linux >>> plateform >> >> >> Ah, now I see MAC OS is an option. I always though it's one of the >> special scopes for this CWS. That makes my above remark concerning the >> IRC chat obsolete. I just leave there, because it's still interesting >> for ongoing discussion. OK, we can proceed with the CWS and file another >> issue against MAC OS porting project. BTW, are you a member of the MAC >> port? If not, that may have been my major misconception. >> >> The CWS process only requires testing on Windows and one other platform >> out of Linux, Solaris Sparc or Solaris x86. But, we might have a special >> case here, because of the involvement of Python being a third party >> product. Maybe Joerg or some other experienced developer reading this >> (hope they hadn't give up due to length :-)) can give some insight here. >> >> >>>> Some information about the role of the QA representative: >>>> - QA Rep. is not in charge to build the source >>>> (This would be even against the idea of the CWS process) >>> >>> This is where i was wrong and I'm really sorry >>> ho is in charge of building on many plateforms ? >> >> >> Here in Beijing we can do Windows and Linux, which (see above) might be >> enough. I know only Sun in Hamburg that could build Solaris if needed. I >> can ask somebody there. I've been working for more than five years with >> them. >> >> >>>> - QA Rep. organizes the QA effort of a CWS >>>> - QA Rep. doesn't organize the whole CWS process >>>> - QA Rep. is not necessarily in charge of doing all the testing >>>> >>> >>> So thanks for pointing the QA missing points >> >> >> No problem, my job. >> >> >>> Do you think once ready for QA we should post on QA list for calling >>> volunteers ? >> >> >> I first wait for replies on this mail. I can take care about this later. >> >> >>>> For the last item, this is even not possible for me. Because I have no >>>> MAC available. I will ask Jogi from Sun in Hamburg to do this part. >>>> (BCCed him.) >>>> >>> >>> Ok ! We may find also other volunteers on mac platform >>> what about solaris ? >> >> >> As stated above, depends on Windows + Linux testing sufficient to get >> the job done. >> >> >>> Once again peter, please forgive me for my misunderstandable words >>> I really hope things are clear now >> >> >> Yes. Do you join OOoCon in Barcelona? I hope my company sends me. Maybe >> we could meet there. >> >> >>> @liyuan : please look at comment in the issue about deprecation. only a >>> suggestion >> >> >> Good idea. >> >> >>> once all is ok (tinderbox do not show any build error on this cws ?), >>> peter let us know what action you need at QA level (find ressources aso >>> ...) - maybe on QA list ? >> >> >> We'll see next weeks. Hopefully there'll be some more replies then. >> >> Best regards >> Peter >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Peter Junge Program Manager and Senior Engineer Open Source Technology Tel：+86-10-58022828 ext. 295 北京红旗中文贰仟软件技术有限公司 Beijing Redflag Chinese 2000 Software Co., Ltd. Address：北京经济技术开发区(亦庄)地盛北街1号A区3号楼(100176) http://www.ch2000.com.cn/english/index.htm --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
