On 1/25/2011 3:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Hi Marshall,
> the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about being
> aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi artifact
> (created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be called
> $ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention.
Ok, sounds right.
I think we need to do a change to follow the convention where the containing
folder name
(in SVN and in the checked-out working copy) is the same as the artifact name;
this is needed to make m2eclipse work, I think.
It also prevents confusion - as there is already a folder called, e.g., Lucas,
and it's confusing to have another folder, also called Lucas, under the
sandbox-osgi-runtime, which has a different (but related) pom.
We would also to change the <modules> content in sandbox-osgi-runtime, to use
those names (which will now match the artifact names).
So for example:
This would change the following:
<modules>
<module>opencalais</module> to .. OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi
<module>alchemyapi</module> to ... alchemy-annotator-osgi
...
<module>solrcas</module> to ... Solrcas-osgi
</modules>
Does this sound right? Or have I missed something?
-Marshall
> Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part, maybe
> replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component .
>
> Cheers,
> Tommaso
>
>
> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi Tommaso,
>>
>> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization between
>> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the pom
>> names the
>> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter). Which way should it be?
>>
>> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in
>> "sandbox-osgi-runtime".
>> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is
>> intended
>> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name? (I'm thinking that at
>> some
>> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular projects...)
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
