2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <[email protected]>

>
>
> On 1/25/2011 3:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> > Hi Marshall,
> > the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about
> being
> > aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi artifact
> > (created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be called
> > $ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention.
>
> Ok, sounds right.
>
> I think we need to do a change to follow the convention where the
> containing
> folder name
> (in SVN and in the checked-out working copy) is the same as the artifact
> name;
> this is needed to make m2eclipse work, I think.
> It also prevents confusion - as there is already a folder called, e.g.,
> Lucas,
> and it's confusing to have another folder, also called Lucas, under the
> sandbox-osgi-runtime, which has a different (but related) pom.
>
> We would also to change the <modules> content in sandbox-osgi-runtime, to
> use
> those names (which will now match the artifact names).
>
> So for example:
>
> This would change the following:
>
>  <modules>
>    <module>opencalais</module>  to .. OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi
>    <module>alchemyapi</module> to ... alchemy-annotator-osgi
>   ...
>    <module>solrcas</module>        to ... Solrcas-osgi
>  </modules>
>
> Does this sound right?  Or have I missed something?
>

Yep Marshall that sounds good :)
Tommaso


>
> -Marshall
>
> > Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part, maybe
> > replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component .
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tommaso
> >
> >
> > 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <[email protected]>
> >
> >> Hi Tommaso,
> >>
> >> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization
> between
> >> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the pom
> >> names the
> >> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter).  Which way should it be?
> >>
> >> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in
> >> "sandbox-osgi-runtime".
> >> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is
> >> intended
> >> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name?  (I'm thinking that at
> >> some
> >> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular
> projects...)
> >>
> >> -Marshall
> >>
>

Reply via email to