Tommaso - Can I do this naming change, or do you want to handle it? -Marshall
On 1/25/2011 5:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> > >> >> On 1/25/2011 3:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: >>> Hi Marshall, >>> the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about >> being >>> aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi artifact >>> (created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be called >>> $ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention. >> Ok, sounds right. >> >> I think we need to do a change to follow the convention where the >> containing >> folder name >> (in SVN and in the checked-out working copy) is the same as the artifact >> name; >> this is needed to make m2eclipse work, I think. >> It also prevents confusion - as there is already a folder called, e.g., >> Lucas, >> and it's confusing to have another folder, also called Lucas, under the >> sandbox-osgi-runtime, which has a different (but related) pom. >> >> We would also to change the <modules> content in sandbox-osgi-runtime, to >> use >> those names (which will now match the artifact names). >> >> So for example: >> >> This would change the following: >> >> <modules> >> <module>opencalais</module> to .. OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi >> <module>alchemyapi</module> to ... alchemy-annotator-osgi >> ... >> <module>solrcas</module> to ... Solrcas-osgi >> </modules> >> >> Does this sound right? Or have I missed something? >> > Yep Marshall that sounds good :) > Tommaso > > >> -Marshall >> >>> Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part, maybe >>> replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component . >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tommaso >>> >>> >>> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Hi Tommaso, >>>> >>>> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization >> between >>>> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the pom >>>> names the >>>> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter). Which way should it be? >>>> >>>> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in >>>> "sandbox-osgi-runtime". >>>> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is >>>> intended >>>> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name? (I'm thinking that at >>>> some >>>> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular >> projects...) >>>> -Marshall >>>>
