Hi Marshall,
no problem for me, you can certainly do it; I was just wondering which name
could be the best to change the sandbox-osgi-runtime to, so I waited for
some feedback first ;-) Do you have any preference?
Cheers,
Tommaso

2011/1/27 Marshall Schor <[email protected]>

> Tommaso - Can I do this naming change, or do you want to handle it?
> -Marshall
>
> On 1/25/2011 5:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> > 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <[email protected]>
> >
> >>
> >> On 1/25/2011 3:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> >>> Hi Marshall,
> >>> the name Solrcas-osgi is due to what we decided some times ago about
> >> being
> >>> aligned with Felix Commons practices which specify that the OSGi
> artifact
> >>> (created with Maven Felix Plugin) of a non OSGi artifact should be
> called
> >>> $ARTIFACTID-osgi so I maintained that convention.
> >> Ok, sounds right.
> >>
> >> I think we need to do a change to follow the convention where the
> >> containing
> >> folder name
> >> (in SVN and in the checked-out working copy) is the same as the artifact
> >> name;
> >> this is needed to make m2eclipse work, I think.
> >> It also prevents confusion - as there is already a folder called, e.g.,
> >> Lucas,
> >> and it's confusing to have another folder, also called Lucas, under the
> >> sandbox-osgi-runtime, which has a different (but related) pom.
> >>
> >> We would also to change the <modules> content in sandbox-osgi-runtime,
> to
> >> use
> >> those names (which will now match the artifact names).
> >>
> >> So for example:
> >>
> >> This would change the following:
> >>
> >>  <modules>
> >>    <module>opencalais</module>  to .. OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi
> >>    <module>alchemyapi</module> to ... alchemy-annotator-osgi
> >>   ...
> >>    <module>solrcas</module>        to ... Solrcas-osgi
> >>  </modules>
> >>
> >> Does this sound right?  Or have I missed something?
> >>
> > Yep Marshall that sounds good :)
> > Tommaso
> >
> >
> >> -Marshall
> >>
> >>> Regarding the name I agree that we should drop the 'sandbox' part,
> maybe
> >>> replacing it with something like addons/annotators/component .
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Tommaso
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2011/1/25 Marshall Schor <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Tommaso,
> >>>>
> >>>> I think there's a spelling error - a discrepancy in capitalization
> >> between
> >>>> sandbox-osgi-runtime <modules> where it calls out solrcas, but the pom
> >>>> names the
> >>>> artifact Solrcas (capital first letter).  Which way should it be?
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, I'm wondering about using the word "sandbox" in
> >>>> "sandbox-osgi-runtime".
> >>>> Can we have a name which is more indicative of what this grouping is
> >>>> intended
> >>>> for, and maybe drop the sandbox part of the name?  (I'm thinking that
> at
> >>>> some
> >>>> point in the future, sandbox projects may become more regular
> >> projects...)
> >>>> -Marshall
> >>>>
>

Reply via email to