One more thing -

If you use http://uima.markmail.org <http://uima.markmail.org/> and then search
for those words (e.g., not seeing document names document analyzer), it will
show you the results with the ability to follow the thread.

There you would see this conclusion :-) (because this problem was discovered
before).  I couldn't see how to follow the thread in the reader you were using.

-Marshall

On 8/22/2011 6:49 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> unfortunately, the mailing list doesn't support attachments.
>
> But, is it related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2097 - a bug
> which produces doc0, doc1, etc names when the path that test data are on has a
> "blank" in the path name?
>
> If so, this is a known limitation, already fixed in the "trunk", which will be
> released with our next UIMA SDK release.
>
> The work-around, in the meanwhile, is to not use paths which include a blank.
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 8/22/2011 12:41 AM, George Herson wrote:
>> Dear Sir/Ms.,
>>
>> http://uima.apache.org/doc-uima-examples.html shows
>>
>> Analyzed Documents view
>>
>> but I got names not as helpful:
>>
>> Suggestions?
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.uima.general/3333/match=doc0+xmi 
>> didn’t reproduce this issue I believe because the test was done with 
>> descriptor src/main/descriptors/tutorial/ex1/RoomNumberAnnotator.xml
>>
>> instead of the one given in the tutorial,
>> <UIMA_HOME>/examples/descriptors/analysis_engine/UIMA_Analysis_Example.xml
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> *George Herson*| Application Developer | Enterprise Marketing & Brand
>> Execution | Solutions for Business
>> Eastman Kodak Company | 15 Bank Street *|* Stamford, CT, 06901 | USA |
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | (203) 653-2521 t |
>> (203) 348-0213 f | _
>> _www.automation.kodak.com <http://www.automation.kodak.com/>
>>

Reply via email to