+1 Tommaso
2012/10/19 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> > > On 10/18/2012 11:15 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > after some delay due to hardware breakdown, OS upgrade, etc., I'd like > to continue bringing the uimaFIT contribution process further along. > > > > Thank you for your comments to UIMA-2470. > > > > The comments raise no blockers towards the contribution of the staging > package [1] as is, only several suggestions on changes that need to be made > eventually as part of the contribution process. One vote was cast towards > the contributing the staging packages as is and perform the suggested > changes after the contribution. I also think that would be preferable to > maintain a clear legacy trace. > > > > So I'm going to test my luck and call for a formal vote now. > > > > I'm asking if you will please VOTE on bringing uimaFIT via the prepared > staging package [1] into the Sandbox, after we get a software grant for it. > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the contribution > > [ ] 0 Don't care > > [ ] -1 Veto the contribution (please explain why) > > +1 -Marshall Schor > > > > Best regards, > > > > -- Richard > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2470 > > > > > >
