+1 On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Peter Klügl <[email protected]>wrote:
> +1 > > Peter > > Am 18.10.2012 17:15, schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho: > > Hello everybody, >> >> after some delay due to hardware breakdown, OS upgrade, etc., I'd like to >> continue bringing the uimaFIT contribution process further along. >> >> Thank you for your comments to UIMA-2470. >> >> The comments raise no blockers towards the contribution of the staging >> package [1] as is, only several suggestions on changes that need to be made >> eventually as part of the contribution process. One vote was cast towards >> the contributing the staging packages as is and perform the suggested >> changes after the contribution. I also think that would be preferable to >> maintain a clear legacy trace. >> >> So I'm going to test my luck and call for a formal vote now. >> >> I'm asking if you will please VOTE on bringing uimaFIT via the prepared >> staging package [1] into the Sandbox, after we get a software grant for it. >> >> [ ] +1 Approve the contribution >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Veto the contribution (please explain why) >> >> Best regards, >> >> -- Richard >> >> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/UIMA-2470<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2470> >> > >
