Hi Richard, What are the next steps here? Are you waiting on us, or on paperwork fixing?
-Marshall On 10/26/2012 2:52 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > The vote passes with 4 +1 votes and no other votes received. > > +1 Marshall Schor > +1 Tommaso Teofili > +1 Peter Klügl > +1 Jaroslaw Cwiklik > > Thanks for voting! > > I'll now fix the paperwork. Thank you for your support! > > -- Richard > >>>> Thank you for your comments to UIMA-2470. >>>> >>>> The comments raise no blockers towards the contribution of the staging >>>> package [1] as is, only several suggestions on changes that need to be made >>>> eventually as part of the contribution process. One vote was cast towards >>>> the contributing the staging packages as is and perform the suggested >>>> changes after the contribution. I also think that would be preferable to >>>> maintain a clear legacy trace. >>>> >>>> So I'm going to test my luck and call for a formal vote now. >>>> >>>> I'm asking if you will please VOTE on bringing uimaFIT via the prepared >>>> staging package [1] into the Sandbox, after we get a software grant for it. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Approve the contribution >>>> [ ] 0 Don't care >>>> [ ] -1 Veto the contribution (please explain why) >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> -- Richard >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/UIMA-2470<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2470> >
