On 12/10/2012 5:16 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > Hi, > > it looks like we have submitted all the necessary documents: > > 1) a signed software grant from Technische Universität Darmstadt > 2) a signed software grant from the University of Colorado > 3) a signed license agreement from Fabio Mancinelli > > I got direct confirmations that Craig ([email protected]) received the > documents for 1) and 3). I have been told by the University of Colorado that > they also got a confirmation for 2). > > To my knowledge, this resolves the contribution process, so that we can now > officially attach the contribution ZIP to UIMA-2470, right? Yes. > > I have also submitted an ICLA. As far as I know, Steven has also already > submitted an ICLA as part of the cTakes incubation. Some time back I though > that I had seen a web page listing the names of all people with signed ICLAs > and all companies with signed CCLAs, but unfortunately I do not find it > anymore. Here's how I find it. Start at incubator.apache.org - left nav - "Who We Are" - bottom of that page has link to all committers - 3rd paragr has link to Persons with Signed CLAs who are not yet committers.
-Marshall > > Cheers, > > -- Richard > > Am 19.11.2012 um 17:41 schrieb Marshall Schor <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Richard, >> >> What are the next steps here? Are you waiting on us, or on paperwork fixing? >> >> -Marshall >> >> On 10/26/2012 2:52 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >>> The vote passes with 4 +1 votes and no other votes received. >>> >>> +1 Marshall Schor >>> +1 Tommaso Teofili >>> +1 Peter Klügl >>> +1 Jaroslaw Cwiklik >>> >>> Thanks for voting! >>> >>> I'll now fix the paperwork. Thank you for your support! >>> >>> -- Richard >>> >>>>>> Thank you for your comments to UIMA-2470. >>>>>> >>>>>> The comments raise no blockers towards the contribution of the staging >>>>>> package [1] as is, only several suggestions on changes that need to be >>>>>> made >>>>>> eventually as part of the contribution process. One vote was cast towards >>>>>> the contributing the staging packages as is and perform the suggested >>>>>> changes after the contribution. I also think that would be preferable to >>>>>> maintain a clear legacy trace. >>>>>> >>>>>> So I'm going to test my luck and call for a formal vote now. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm asking if you will please VOTE on bringing uimaFIT via the prepared >>>>>> staging package [1] into the Sandbox, after we get a software grant for >>>>>> it. >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the contribution >>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care >>>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the contribution (please explain why) >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Richard >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/UIMA-2470<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2470> >
