I completely agree and will prepare the necessary changes (this weekend
or next week)
Peter
On 30.11.2012 16:48, Marshall Schor wrote:
I think before voting +1, it is important to attempt reproduce the "build" of
this.
To that end, can we get some update(s) to our web site that describes how to do
this?
I'm wondering, for instance, if the "one-time-setup" page needs updating, for
the Eclipse part (which currently says to use an older version of the m2e
eclipse plugin).
And the page "release" describes how to build the eclipse update site. But I'm
guessing it now needs some additions to cover whatever the new process is. Can
that be updated?
I guess the updates would need to be temporarily labeled to indicate they are
for a pending new style of the update site.
I haven't yet had a chance to look at the changes yet. I hope to get to this
soon, maybe this weekend :-).
-Marshall
On 11/29/2012 11:31 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
this vote is about replacing the current update site with a composite
repository, which essentially contains the same artifacts as before.
We discussed in UIMA-2475 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2475)
that the update site of Apache UIMA is not compatible with p2 repositories.
This complicates, for example, the development of bundles built with Tycho.
The result of the discussion is right now a composite repository, which refers
to two update sites. The first one is exactly the currently published update
site (legacy) and the second one is a p2 repository (uima-2.4.0) containing
the eclipse bundles of the 2.4.0 release. Note that these artifacts are
provided twice.
The new update site (composite repository) is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/eclipse-packagings/eclipse-update-site
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
[ ] 0 Don't care
PS: As this is essentially not a new release, I skipped most/all parts
mentioned in http://uima.apache.org/release.html
