hi,

I'm just now having a chance to look at this (sorry for the delay).

Some initial questions:

As part of this update, the UIMA SVN has a new top-level folder, parallel with
uimaj, uima-as, etc., called eclipse-packagings.

I noticed this folder is missing the normal trunk/tags/branches subfolders.  It
would seem to me that we should have those, and when a new packaging is done, it
would have a version, and be "tagged", like a release. 

I realize it may not be considered a release (because it's just a re-packaging
of the already released Jars) but it still seems to me that we should have a
trunk and a tags for this, and tag what we promote out.

Another question:  There's a pom at the top level of the folder
eclipse-packagings.  It says its for artifact "eclipse-packagings", and has a
version number of "4".

I would think it would have a version number of "1", since it's the first
version being released.

More later...

-Marshall

On 11/29/2012 11:31 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this vote is about replacing the current update site with a composite
> repository, which essentially contains the same artifacts as before.
>
> We discussed in UIMA-2475 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2475)
> that the update site of Apache UIMA is not compatible with p2 repositories.
> This complicates, for example, the development of bundles built with Tycho.
> The result of the discussion is right now a composite repository, which refers
> to two update sites. The first one is exactly the currently published update
> site (legacy) and the second one is a p2 repository (uima-2.4.0) containing
> the eclipse bundles of the 2.4.0 release. Note that these artifacts are
> provided twice.
>
> The new update site (composite repository) is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/eclipse-packagings/eclipse-update-site
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> [ ] 0   Don't care
>
> PS: As this is essentially not a new release, I skipped most/all parts
> mentioned in http://uima.apache.org/release.html
>
>

Reply via email to