ok - I'll take a run at doing the things I mentioned :-)
-Marshall
On 1/7/2013 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to push this issue a bit.
>
> What do we need to change for a new vote?
>
> Marshall, do you want to restructure the update sites in SVN?
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 19.12.2012 14:17, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 19.12.2012 06:27, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I'm just now having a chance to look at this (sorry for the delay).
>>>
>>> Some initial questions:
>>>
>>> As part of this update, the UIMA SVN has a new top-level folder, parallel
>>> with
>>> uimaj, uima-as, etc., called eclipse-packagings.
>>>
>>> I noticed this folder is missing the normal trunk/tags/branches subfolders.
>>> It
>>> would seem to me that we should have those, and when a new packaging is
>>> done, it
>>> would have a version, and be "tagged", like a release.
>>>
>>> I realize it may not be considered a release (because it's just a
>>> re-packaging
>>> of the already released Jars) but it still seems to me that we should have a
>>> trunk and a tags for this, and tag what we promote out.
>>>
>>> Another question: There's a pom at the top level of the folder
>>> eclipse-packagings. It says its for artifact "eclipse-packagings", and has
>>> a
>>> version number of "4".
>>>
>>> I would think it would have a version number of "1", since it's the first
>>> version being released.
>>
>> I agree on all points. One thing I want to mention: We need some strategy for
>> the version number as this packaging will probably contain releases with
>> different version numbers, e.g., uima-2.4.0 and hopefully
>> uima-textmarker-2.0.0
>> Therefore the number will be increased with asynchronous releases.
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>>> More later...
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2012 11:31 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> this vote is about replacing the current update site with a composite
>>>> repository, which essentially contains the same artifacts as before.
>>>>
>>>> We discussed in UIMA-2475 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2475)
>>>> that the update site of Apache UIMA is not compatible with p2 repositories.
>>>> This complicates, for example, the development of bundles built with Tycho.
>>>> The result of the discussion is right now a composite repository, which
>>>> refers
>>>> to two update sites. The first one is exactly the currently published
>>>> update
>>>> site (legacy) and the second one is a p2 repository (uima-2.4.0) containing
>>>> the eclipse bundles of the 2.4.0 release. Note that these artifacts are
>>>> provided twice.
>>>>
>>>> The new update site (composite repository) is here:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/eclipse-packagings/eclipse-update-site
>>>>
>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>
>>>> PS: As this is essentially not a new release, I skipped most/all parts
>>>> mentioned in http://uima.apache.org/release.html
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
